He can’t sing a note. They definitely don’t make tap shoes in his size. And, aside from some extremely expressive growls and roars, he doesn’t exactly sizzle at delivering dialogue. And yet the title character in the musical version of “King Kong” is, without question, the dazzling star of the show. He alone carries the weight of this lavish production (capitalized at up to $36.5 million) on his broad, hirsute back. Unfortunately, it’s not a very heavy burden. In fact, remove the big, strangely beautiful beast from the show, and the musical would collapse from its own weightlessness. The human…

 This article is exclusive to Broadway News Plus subscribers. 

Become a Broadway News Plus subscriber.

Subscribe today to get unlimited access to Broadway News and support the future of theater journalism.

Already a Broadway News Plus subscriber? Log in here.